We basically apply CSS with classes, id and HTML tags. If you are using the most preferred way(creating an extra file with a .css extension) to apply CSS on classes and id is pretty easy we use "." to express classes and "#" to show id. For example if I have a header with a class of "header-one" , a paragraph with an id of "paragraph-one" and an HTML tag of ul We write it as
.header-one{
}
#paragraph-one{
}
ul{
} and we put all the styles we want between the curly braces. As you can see for normal HTML tags we don't need any symbol to express it. Just writing the normal HTML tag would be enough.
We basically apply CSS with classes, id and HTML tags. If you are using the most preferred way(creating an extra file with a .css extension) to apply CSS on classes and id is pretty easy we use "." to express classes and "#" to show id. For example if I have a header with a class of "header-one" , a paragraph with an id of "paragraph-one" and an HTML tag of ul We write it as
.header-one{
}
#paragraph-one{
}
ul{
} and we put all the styles we want between the curly braces. As you can see for normal HTML tags we don't need any symbol to express it. Just writing the normal HTML tag would be enough.
BY Programming Diaries
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283
A Telegram spokesman declined to comment on the bond issue or the amount of the debt the company has due. The spokesman said Telegram’s equipment and bandwidth costs are growing because it has consistently posted more than 40% year-to-year growth in users.
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
